Response to Negative Online Attacks
I am an
active advocate for alternative medicine. In recent years, that has resulted
in widespread attacks on me. None of the attackers know me personally.
The attacks
are generated by a loose knit group of skeptics who also, for the most part, are atheists. [i] They chose me as a target based on an editorial I wrote in my local
paper and their mistaken belief that I was capable of censoring one of their members.
Despite
their complete lack of knowledge of me and my practice, the group has chosen to personally attack me in an effort to make
me either silent or to force me to retire. If any of the individuals involved
had ever been, or even spoken to, any of my patients the attacks might have been successful.
As any good
medical practitioner would do, I have engaged in introspection of my practice and my methods.
I failed to find sufficient justification for the virulence directed against me, so I reached out to the community
that attacked me. I spent several months discussing, often with heated tones,
my practice and methods. I took all comers, answered all questions, and failed
to find even one of my accusers capable of sustained debate.
All of my
accusers claimed science as a foundation point, but none engaged in a scientific method.
They began with an assumption that everything I did was useless medically.[ii] As I explained that much of what I do involves nutrition and lifestyle,
they backpedaled to a stance that nothing I did offered a unique approach to medicine.
My field had nothing to offer. When I explained the process of putting
together pieces from various medical specialties and helping patients see the whole picture, I was told to give examples. I gave several examples, and was told they were invalid in some way, the studies were
poor, etc. I then did an exhaustive study for one skeptic within his own specialty. I provided him with several possible treatments he was not currently using. His response was to stop any and all conversation.
At that
point I began producing my own blog posts, twittering, etc. The skeptics had
so filled the search engines with their attacks that it was no longer possible for patients to even find my website. I have been somewhat effective, and continue to explore other options.
I regret
much of the anger evident in my earlier responses to the attacks. At the time
I mistakenly thought I was dealing with individuals who had selected me personally for insult.
Instead, I am merely a tiny piece in a large social drama playing out within medicine.
If you have
any questions or concerns about the attacks, please feel free to email me personally.
Do not be afraid to hurt my feelings, as I have developed a fairly thick skin.
I would have questions myself, which I have attempted to answer here.
For
a detailed Youtube video done earlier giving my side of the story, click here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_COj567R28
[i] While many atheists are content to maintain
silence, these atheists actively promote their non-belief, which makes them evangelical atheists. They also follow several designated leaders and do not question their leaders despite clear evidence that
their leaders are mistaken. This aspect of their community is termed authoritarianism
and the authoritarian movement within American atheism has been documented by sociologists.
In my interactions with the group, I read an entire book on authoritarianism.
It was very helpful in understanding the venomous, illogical responses I generated from any interaction.
[ii] The assumption that
such a negative view can be proven is debatable, even in skeptics’ circles: http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=12860